Azerbaijan's Acts of Agression Hinder the Democratisation Process in Armenia

06.10.2022

Genya Petrosyan, Director of the LDPF participates in the OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meetings in Warsaw. Yesterday she gave a speech on the issues in the judicial system, democratic reform, and security challenges faced by Armenia. She mentioned that although Armenia is on the path of democratic reforms, some processes are too slow and there are also objective reasons for that, first and foremost, serious security challenges faced by Armenia which shift the attention from the reforms agenda to the addressing of primary security needs of people.

So, human rights standards and commitments undertaken in the scopes of the OSCE suppose straightforward assessment of these actions by member states and actual legal consequences for the state committing war crimes and grossly violating human rights.”

The full text is available below.

Lack of independence, internal and external pressures, and corruption in the judiciary were systemic issues in Armenia for years. National and international actors, including the Ombudsman of Armenia, constantly voiced these problems in their statements and reports. Regularly adopted strategies and action plans did not result in substantial changes. Therefore, the «velvet revolution» of 2018 furthermore supposed comprehensive changes in the judiciary since the low level of trust in the justice system was one of the reasons behind the revolution. We are convinced that only the extraordinary vetting procedure of judges will be able to address the existing situation of the judiciary in the short run.

Following the revolution Armenian Government adopted new judicial reforms strategies which also provided for transitional justice tools, including the establishment of the fact-finding commission on the human rights violations. Although Armenia is on the path of democratic reforms, some processes are too slow and there are also objective reasons for that, first and foremost, serious security challenges faced by Armenia which shift the attention from the reforms agenda to the addressing of primary security needs of people.

In particular, the atrocities and gross human rights violations of Armenian population committed by Azerbaijan during the 44-day war against Nagorno Karabakh in 2020 and in the period following the ceasefire, as well as aggression against Armenia in 2021, remained unpunished. This impunity and inadequate response from the international community were amongst the reasons of the large-scale unprovoked aggression initiated by Azerbaijan against the sovereign territory of Armenia on September 13, in flagrant disregard of international law. The aggression of Azerbaijan was accompanied by shelling of civilian population and infrastructure, resulting in over 200 dead or missing Armenian citizens, 5 killed civilians, and hundreds of wounded, thousands of internally displaced people. Torture, ill-treatment, and extrajudicial killings of civilians and prisoners of war, including horrifying scenes of mutilation and torture of women servicemembers in the recent attacks are the continuation of the criminal behavior of Azerbaijan nourished by impunity.

So, human rights standards and commitments undertaken in the scopes of the OSCE suppose straightforward assessment of these actions by member states and actual legal consequences for the state committing war crimes and grossly violating human rights.

Armenia: New Draft Law on Public Information to Improve Open Data Management and Access

10.04.2024
On February 26, 2024, the Ministry of High-Technology Industry released a draft of a new law “On Public Information” as well as amendments and additions to related laws, for public discussion. According to the government, this law will serve as a basis of implementing open data policy, and in particular, enable public oversight over the performance of state and local self-government bodies. The new draft defines: the conditions and procedure for providing public information; the methods of ensuring access to public information and managing its usage; and how to regulate the collection, processing, use of information, establishment of databases and their management.

The Administrative Court satisfied the claim of the TI Armenia NGO against the Staff of The National Assembly

09.04.2024
The Administrative Court of the RA satisfied the claim of the Transparency International Armenia NGO against the Staff of The National Assembly, recognizing not legitimate the latter’s activity to refuse the participation of the plaintiff’s representative as an observer at the interview stage of the competition for the vacancy of the member of the Corruption Prevention Commission. The TI claimed that its rights to seek and receive information, guaranteed by the RA Constitution, had been violated as its right to conduct observation mission over the contest had been restricted. Genya Petrosyan, Davit Gyurjyan, and Sergey Grigoryan, lawyers and attorneys at the Law Development and Protection Foundation represented the TI in the court.

Announcement in Support of Georgian Civil Society and Democratic Processes in the Region

09.03.2023
On March 7 of this year, a large-scale peaceful protest action was held in Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia, against the adoption of the so-called "Russian law". Despite the negative assessment of that law by a number of international organizations and the civil society of the neighboring country, the Georgian parliament, nevertheless, adopted the controversial law "on foreign agents" on first reading.