Compulsory Enforcement of Judicial Acts in the light of the right to a fair trial

The purpose of this research is to reveal the international standards and best practices in order to identify applicable procedures and tools used by courts in the process of recognizing the violation of the given right and compensating for non-pecuniary damage as a consequence of its violation. The relevant legislation of five member states of the Council of Europe was studied. 

The purpose of this study was to identify the main issues of the compulsory enforcement of judicial acts, to analyze the root causes of the problems and make recommendations. The respective legislation and practice have been studied in the framework of the research based on the analysis of judicial practice, as well as the data provided by the Compulsory Enforcement Service and other state bodies. International practice and

The over-all objective of the research is to enhance transparency and accountability of the Disciplinary Commission thus contributing to the reduction of corruption risks at the initial stage of the disciplinary procedure against judges and strengthening independence of the Judiciary.

The purpose of this study was to identify issues related to the implementation of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against Armenia in the cases where the Court found a violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Within the scope of the research a number of judgments delivered in respect of Armenia were highlighted, general measures undertaken by the state, as well as relevant legislation, law enforcement practice, responses to the inquiries referred to the competent authorities have been studied and analyzed.